CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

A common response to DEI issues is to take a colorblind approach:

  • “I don’t see differences in people. It doesn’t impact what I do whatsoever.”
  • “I treat everyone the same. We all should.”
  • “The solution to racism and bias is to treat everyone equally.”

The ideology behind colorblindness ignores core truths fundamental to the function of DEI, such as:

  • Everyone has bias. The terms unconscious bias and implicit bias already let us know that we possess biases we are unaware of. When it comes to these, the goal is to become more aware of our own bias, learn how to mitigate it and work toward daily improvement.
  • Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination are baked into our institutions, formalized policies and procedures. Even if a person acts without bias, they could still perpetuate biased outcomes just by participating in institutions with systemic inequity. In these cases, the actions of the individual retain some level of bias.
  • Equality is different from equity. The basis of colorblindness is equality, the idea that we should treat everyone the same. This is not our current reality, and it never has been. Hundreds of years of legal racism, sexism and ableism have resulted in a world that favors some and poses challenges for others. Equity requires that we take a targeted approach to dismantle these challenges. Equity in action may look like providing additional resources or support only to groups that have historically been denied access to resources and support.
  • Intent is not enough. Colorblind statements often stem from the desire for us to have a society that treats everyone the same. While it may be well-intentioned, intent alone does nothing to dismantle systemic challenges and level the playing field. To be successful, intent must be turned into action, practices, procedures and culture.
  • It leads us to problematic conclusions. These statements ignore that people’s lives, health, jobs, wealth, etc., have been shaped by racist and sexist policies. It’s necessary to acknowledge the role of history and see these differences in access and opportunity to understand the wealth and health disparities we see today. Data that shows less wealth and more poor health outcomes for marginalized groups may lead to conclusions about a deficiency in people, not structures and environment. Proper context must be applied when evaluating solutions/responses to equality.

Instead of sharing colorblind ideologies, pause and consider where your words stem from. Often, it’s easier to deflect by making these statements instead of engaging with DEI topics because it may feel uncomfortable. Instead of running from it, recognize the discomfort and unpack the internal conflict. Are you triggered by topics of power, privilege, racism or sexism because of your identity? Learn more about these topics and work toward resolving the internal conflict so that your actions can meet your intentions.

Next: “Master” and “Slave” Or, return to all guidebooks