CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

The Texas Attorney General filed a lawsuit yesterday against ISS, alleging that the firm violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. A simultaneous filing was made by the West Virginia Attorney General in a separate, but substantially similar case. Texas and West Virginia argue that ISS improperly considers ESG factors that are unrelated to financial returns and that this consideration misleads its clients. The Texas lawsuit summarizes these allegations, stating:

“ISS’s advertising is deceptive as it fails to adequately inform clients of its ESG initiatives. Specifically, the company incorporates these financially imprudent ideologies into its ‘Benchmark’ objective analyses, without providing empirical support for its preferences or emphasizing the opportunity costs to the investor’s bottom line. By excluding financial analyses in these benchmark reports, ISS fails to show whether the ESG-oriented advice given was designed to be in clients’ best financial interests, as advertised. This is also a violation of ISS’s fiduciary duty as a proxy advisor to provide such advice, and misleading to Texas consumers who depend on such advice to grow their pensions and other investment accounts. It also stands in contrast to current financial market and political trends regarding ESG.”

There are quite a few holes in these arguments. For one, in 2025, ISS backed very few shareholder proposals. Additionally, the states argue that considering ESG factors compromises the independence and objectivity of ISS. This argument fails to recognize that ESG and climate risk management can be considered independently and objectively. Acknowledging ESG risks is not a political stance. ISS seemingly has ample defenses in both cases. However, the anti-ESG movement has a track record of getting settlements out of meritless litigation.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile